Heath Ledger, Homophobia, and the Conservative Closet

I know this is off the topic of the 2008 Senate races, but this has been sticking in my craw all week.  By now, you're probably aware of the fairly twisted jokes Faux News personality John Gibson made out of the death of Heath Ledger, as well as Gibson's piling on, and subsequent half-assed pseudo-apology (probably at the prodding of corporate sponsors).  And you're probably aware of the wingnut hate group who shall remain nameless here planning to protest Ledger's funeral ceremony because, as it clearly says in the Bible, it is an abomination not only to be gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered, but it's also an abomination to play a gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgendered character in a movie.

Why is it that more people (members of the media, bloggers, talk show hosts, people I overhear chatting on the subway) aren't talking about the plain fact that, in a conservative movement and a Republican Party in which anything other than Leave It to Beaver-style heterosexuality and family structures are frowned upon, to say the least, there is a very significant chunk of members who are gay?  Really gay.  Totally gay.  And doing everything they can to hide it.  And that the more vocally anti-gay one is, the more likely, it appears, that person is conflicted about their own sexual orientation?

Wikipedia's entry on "latent homosexuality" notes that:

A theory that homophobia is a result of latent homosexuality was put forth in the late 20th century. A 1996 study conducted at the University of Georgia by Henry Adams, Lester Wright Jr., and Bethany Lohr indicates that a number of "homophobic" males exhibit latent homosexuality.

This brings us to the ironic tale of former Congressman Ed Schrock.  Schrock was a conservative legislator for Virginia, and was especially conservative on the gays.  He co-sponsored an amendment to the U.S. Constitution banning same-sex marriage; and, this Navy veteran firmly, oh so firmly, believed that the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy regarding "homosexual conduct" in the military should have been replaced by an outright ban on gay people from serving in the military.  This guy was very anti-gay.  Ipso facto, he must have been very heterosexual.  Heck, he must have been the heterosexualest!  Then why was it that Schrock, amid his second term in Congress in 2004, all of a sudden announced that he was dropping his effort to seek re-election to a third term?  It probably had a lot to do with Schrock's very explicit audio-profile on a gay sex personals website.  Schrock's veneer of, what George Costanza would call, an umblemished record of staunch heterosexuality was mortally compromised; so, after being yanked out of the conservative closet, he had to leave the conservative club.

(Much more after the flip.)

Jon Stewart of The Daily Show broached the topic of the conservative closet almost three years ago, with all deserving satire, following the outing of Spokane Washington Mayor Jim West.  Mayor West, a Republican, had an anti-gay record that would make Ed Schrock proud.  The Daily Show highlights that West worked to bar gay people from working in schools, opposed anti-gay discrimination measures, and vetoed an ordinance giving partnership rights to gay employees.  With a record like that, West must be straight!  As it turns out:

West was caught by a local newspaper that hired someone to pose as a seventeen-year-old boy on Gay.com.  The mayor called it a brutal outing, while everyone else called it perfect irony.

By the way, out of curiosity, just a minor point, off the subject... uh, how many times do the anti-gay force guys have to get caught in gay trysts before everybody just realizes they're all gay?  If you wanna meet gay dudes, start cruising the anti-gay buffet because it's out there, baby!

Stewart rightfully suggests that West, with his socially conservative anti-gay record, may have been "overcompensating."  And situations like this aren't limited to Republicans Ed Schrock and Jim West.  There is a reason even casual observers of politics and current events may have heard of Mark Foley, Ted Haggard, Jeff Gannon/James Guckert, Matt Sanchez, and Larry Craig.  As Bill Maher once commented, "It's guys like Larry Craig, the Senator, who forces guys like Larry Craig, the man, into the airport toilet."  And Larry Craig isn't the only Republican member of Congress dogged by rumors regarding their sexual orientation.  Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, Senator Lindsey Graham and Congressman David Dreier have all been subject to speculation regarding their orientation.  Heck, former chairman of the Republican National Committee and Bush-Cheney 2004 campaign manager Ken Mehlman has even been the talk of the town.

Salon also tackled the topic of the crowded conservative closet following the revelations about Larry Craig's summer vacation.  Salon pointed out that the conservative closet is even gaining young new recruits:

The Craig scandal overshadowed still another embarrassing saga from the closets of the red states. During the first week of August, Glenn Murphy, a Republican county chairman from Indiana, mysteriously stepped down as president of the Young Republican National Federation. In a letter to the nation's Young Republican leaders, he claimed that he was obliged to resign because of a pending major business opportunity. That explanation seemed unlikely in light of news concerning an investigation of Murphy for sexually molesting another man after a party. That young gentleman, a guest in a house where Murphy was staying, awoke the next morning to find the chairman's mouth on his genitalia.

Murphy's star may no longer rise, but his tale is a portent for the future. So long as Republicans promote homophobia, the party's closets will be crowded.

There are so many such incidents that a perfectly reasonable person can subscribe to the Jon Stewart theory that pretty much every vocally anti-gay crusader is gay, or at least overcompensating for conflicted feelings on some level - or, in the case of the Republican candidates for President, pandering to those that buy into institutionalized homophobia.  I truly can't fathom what it's like for Log Cabin Republicans, openly gay Republican former Congressman Jim Kolbe, or gay Republicans across the country, working on behalf of and voting for candidates from a Party whose social policy goal is the deprivation of their civil rights.

On a side note, to all those politicians (and it's not limited to just one political Party) who claim that allowing same-sex marriage devalues or undermines "traditional" marriage - like Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, and John McCain - quite seriously, how much less do you love your wife right now than you did on May 16, 2004, the very last day before the Commonwealth of Massachusetts began performing legal, state-sanctioned same-sex marriages?  Surely, if same-sex marriage devalues or undermines marriage for everyone else, you three must love your wives less now than you did before same-sex marriage because, if you didn't, what would all the fuss be about?  (At least Seinfeld's Julia Louis-Dreyfuss set the record straight!)

Anyway, with pretty much any vocally anti-gay or blatantly homophobic individual harboring conflicted feelings about their own sexuality, we return to John Gibson and his tasteless, homophobic stand-up routine following the death of Heath Ledger.  What with Gibson's poofy hair and come-hither grin, we have to assume that he is probably taking up space in the conservative closet.  And, anytime a high-fallutin' social conservative soapboxes on how deleterious the "gay lifestyle" is to the rest of us Leave It to Beaver-style heterosexuals, perhaps we should respond not with disdain but with condolence, knowing why he or she can't just come out of the closet instead of waiting for an Ed-Schrock-Jim-West style outing.

None of us can forget where we were when we first heard those immortal words uttered, "I am not gay.  I never have been gay."  (Seriously, how has that not been made into a cell phone ringtone yet?)  Nevertheless, when you look at precedent, odds suggest that many of these denials are really just pleas to not get kicked out of the conservative club even if they're being yanked out of the conservative closet.  And every gay joke is really just overcompensation for... something.



Display:


Re: Heath Ledger, (none / 0)

Your diary confuses me. On the one hand yes, Gibson is a homophobe and screwed up to say the least. On the other, I don't see how you think what you are saying address the issue? The closet is also wrong, but I don't see how it applies here with what are separate things.

More deeply is the problem that, if we are going to discuss this, the notion that being gay is so wrong one can't even play one in the movies. I suppose your point is then about hypocricy. But that's the least of their sins when it comes to bashing gays.


by bruh21 on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 12:34:40 PM EST

Re: Heath Ledger, Homophobia, and the Conservative (none / 0)

I can see a very, very twisted logic to the conservative closet's diatribe against "the gays".  That logic begins with a belief that homosexuality is wrong.  This must be the starting point for them.  Then, just because someone has gay tendencies does not make that behavior right.  So, the issue is to make it harder for people to "be gay" openly, thereby reducing the chances that they will fall into this sinful lifestyle.  And the ones that most deeply feel this temptation are the ones who are themselves gay.

I think this logic (even though I may disagree with it) is not substantially different than government laws against many things including child pornography, drug use, gun control, etc.  You start with the fundamental belief that a certain behavior is wrong.  Simply because you yourself may be tempted to engage in this behavior does not make it right.


by the mollusk on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 12:57:11 PM EST

Re: This May Seem Like a Stupid Question.... (none / 0)

Is Heath Ledger even Gay?

No, seriously. Is he?

I thought this was all about Ledger ACTING a part as a gay man in Brokeback Mountain, which, of course, makes it ALL the more psychopathic to malign and impugn Heath Ledger for being a "homosexual" because he died and pills were somehow involved. It's just SO sick that it leaves you breathless, to think these wackos would so attack and smear a man for dying because he ACTED A PART IN A MOVIE!

Now, I know Ledger had an addiction to alcohol, and was making an effort to regain sobriety.

But, was Heath Ledger even gay?


"I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Harry S Truman
by Tennessean on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:12:12 PM EST

Re: This May Seem Like a Stupid Question.... (none / 0)

No he wasn't. Which is why I find the post bizzare


by bruh21 on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:13:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This May Seem Like a Stupid Question.... (none / 0)

Well, the logic is that Brokeback Mountain was a strong message in support of tolerance and acceptance, and its lead actors were among the speakers of that message.

If you can wrap your head around why it particularly matters to anyone whether me and my boyfriend can someday be called husbands -- and I certainly can't -- then it's a pretty easy trip from there to calling out Heath Ledger.


by Pender on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:36:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This May Seem Like a Stupid Question.... (none / 0)

Only if you are fucking stupid can one make such a leap from- he's an actor, he played gay, therefore gay, but thats my country.


by bruh21 on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:52:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Heath Ledger, Homophobia, and the Conservative (none / 0)

Here is the 1996 study:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/87720 14

Abstract: The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.

It's science. Homophobic people tend to be closeted gays.


by Pender on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:39:32 PM EST

I am sorry... (none / 0)

...but this is the worst diary I have read in months. No logic. No factual support. Just pure unadulterated bull.


by joliepoint on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 02:02:19 PM EST

What part is bull? (none / 0)


by lestatdelc on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 03:43:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

In defense of the diary (none / 0)

Look this isn't Journal of Medicine. It's a political blog. Gibson's comments on Ledger are utterly sick, and his only "crime" was that he played a gay man in a movie. (God knows what they'll say when Anthony Hopkins dies). How many gays and lesbians work for Fox News whose hate speech makes the lives of open gays and lesbians more difficult and in many cases more dangerous. How many gay and lesbians work for congressmen (or are elected themselves) who support legislation that makes gays and lesbians lives more difficult and serve as political punching bags every two years.

These closet cases are sick individuals who should be outed and humaliated -- pointing out the GOP's hypocracy in shielding them goes a long way to defusing homophobia as an electoral wedge issue.  


by alexmhogan on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 02:18:08 PM EST

Re: In defense of the diary (none / 0)

I dont agree.  I simply think they ascribe it to deviant behavior rathere than question the underlying assumptions that they have about homosexuality.


by bruh21 on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 02:20:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Heath Ledger, Homophobia, and the Conservative (none / 0)

Homosexuality threatens the order of things. When two men have sex, one may be in the passive, or "feminine" role. This is a threat to society's need to have men in dominance over women. Female homosexuality is less of a threat (see any copy of a skin magazine), unless lesbian relationships are given equal legal status which makes them a potential alternative to heterosexual relationships. It isn't a coincidence that feminism (which includes the right to maintain control over one's body, in the form of abortion rights) and gay rights go hand in hand.

When lizard brained conservatives run on the two social issues of gay rights and abortion rights, they are really attempting to enforce womens second-class status. This explains the hollowness of their "culture of life" argument as well as their phony claim of "defending marriage." What they are really attempting to defend is the current order, where men--in general--have dominance over women.  


by cc on Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 06:08:53 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.